North Atlanta Injury Law PC announces the GA Court of Appeals denied a defendant's interlocutory appeal in Baratian v. Strickland (No. A26I0187), upholding a favorable Gwinnett County State Court ruling for its client.



MILTON, GA, September 11, 2026 /24-7PressRelease/ -- North Atlanta Injury Law PC announced that the Court of Appeals of Georgia has denied a defendant's application for interlocutory appeal in Baratian v. Strickland, Case No. A26I0187, leaving intact a ruling from the State Court of Gwinnett County in favor of the firm's client.

The case arose from an August 2023 rear-end collision in Gwinnett County. The defendant was cited at the scene. His defense of the case focused on one thing: whether he had been served quickly enough. He filed a motion for summary judgment and then filed an application with the Court of Appeals for interlocutory review.

The motion was aggressive. Under Georgia law, once a defendant raises a service defense after the statute of limitation has expired, the plaintiff must show she exercised the greatest possible diligence in perfecting service — a demanding standard, and one that ends a great many meritorious cases before any court reaches the facts.

Following a March 2026 hearing, the State Court of Gwinnett County rejected the motion. The court found that "Plaintiff's evidence demonstrates that Plaintiff exercised the greatest possible diligence, such that service after expiration of the limitations period relates back to the timely filing of Plaintiff's complaint."

The defendant sought interlocutory review. On May 6, 2026, the Court of Appeals denied the application, leaving the trial court's ruling undisturbed. The matter was subsequently resolved. Terms are not disclosed.

"The defense didn't dispute that their client caused the impact," said Travis J. Little, principal attorney at North Atlanta Injury Law. "Their defense was focused on the calendar. Our answer to that was a record of exactly what we did, every business day, until service was perfected — and the court found it sufficient."

The defendant had recently moved into a subdivided residence near an out-of-state university, where he had been living just a matter of weeks when suit was filed. Asked directly for his address so he could be served, he provided a street number without the unit designation, and certified mail came back with a postal notice indicating no authorized recipient was available. The firm ran two authorized methods of service concurrently — statutory service through the Georgia Secretary of State under the Nonresident Motorist Act, and personal service through the sheriff's office in the county where the defendant was living — and documented work on service every business day from the date of filing until service was confirmed.

North Atlanta Injury Law PC is a personal injury firm based in Milton, Georgia, representing individuals and families in automobile and trucking collisions, premises liability, product liability, nursing home negligence, and wrongful death matters throughout the state.

Read the original story here: https://www.24-7pressrelease.com/press-release/538491/trial-court-finds-greatest-possible-diligence-in-service-dispute-georgia-court-of-appeals-declines-review

Press Release Service and Press Release Distribution by 24-7 Press Release Newswire